By 1991, Belgium had no federal mandatory sex education curriculum. Instead, education was (and remains) split along linguistic and community lines: the Flemish Community and the French Community each developed their own guidelines. However, a landmark moment came in the 1990s with the rise of HIV/AIDS awareness. In 1991, Belgium was already running public health campaigns promoting condom use, but schools were hesitant to implement comprehensive sex ed. Puberty education — menstruation, wet dreams, body hair, voice changes — was often taught separately: boys in one room, girls in another, with biological diagrams and sparse emotional guidance.
In 1991, many Belgian schools still separated boys and girls for puberty lessons, especially in Catholic institutions. The rationale was to reduce embarrassment. However, progressive state schools in Brussels and Antwerp began piloting mixed-gender sessions, arguing that both sexes needed to understand each other’s development to foster empathy.
Teachers reported that boys were often more vocal about “dirty jokes” while girls listened quietly; only in mixed settings did boys learn about menstruation beyond “she’s on her period.”
If a file named puberty sexual education for boys and girls 1991 belgiumrar better exists, it might be a scanned collection of the following authentic 1991 materials: By 1991, Belgium had no federal mandatory sex
The “better” in your filename could indicate a revised or higher-quality scan compared to an earlier version.
For boys, the tone was different but equally limited:
Boys got booklets like “Van jongen tot man” or “Du garçon à l’homme.” These were even drier than the girls’ versions, often focusing on sperm production and avoiding STDs (mainly syphilis and HIV, which was a growing fear). The “better” in your filename could indicate a
In progressive schools (especially in Brussels), the 1991 puberty class had one mixed session:
A teacher draws a stick figure. "This is a boy. This is a girl. Under the clothes, they have more in common than different. Let’s name the parts."
Then the split. Boys learned about erections and wet dreams. Girls learned about periods and pregnancy. Only in the best schools did both learn about mutual respect, saying no, and how pregnancy actually happens. Boys got booklets like “Van jongen tot man”
| Aspect | 1991 | Today | |--------|------|-------| | Start age | 12-14, too late | 10-11, age-appropriate | | Gender grouping | Separated | Mostly mixed, with single-gender options for sensitive topics | | Masturbation | Ignored for girls, taboo for boys | Normalized as healthy and private | | Consent | Not mentioned | Taught as “FRIES” (Freely given, Reversible, Informed, Enthusiastic, Specific) | | LGBTQ+ | Invisible | Inclusive from age 12: sexual orientation, gender identity | | Pleasure | Never mentioned | Discussed in context of self-knowledge and healthy relationships | | Porn literacy | Not relevant | Taught from age 14: critical analysis of porn versus real sex | | STDs/HIV | Fear-based | Fact-based, including PrEP and testing access |
Since 1991, Belgium has made significant improvements. The turning point came in the early 2000s, with two key reforms: