Interested: 05 Availablity: In Stock
All Religious Books are available in Temple Stores. Our mission is to share the Good of Hinduism, Loving, Faith and Serving.
Always purchase from LexisNexis India. They own the original copyright. Pirated editions often have missing footnotes, blurred case citations, and errors in Latin terms.
The hallmark of a high-quality reference book is a comprehensive subject index and a table of cases running into dozens of pages. You should be able to find Kesavananda Bharati or Maneka Gandhi in seconds.
| Feature | What to Look For | | :--- | :--- | | Edition | 15th Edition (2024 or later) | | Publisher | LexisNexis (logo on spine & title page) | | Binding | Hardbound, sewn | | Paper | Cream, thick, opaque | | Extras | Digital access code + subject index | | Price | ₹2,500 – ₹3,500 (India) / $50–$70 (USA) |
If you are a law student, practitioner, or judge, investing in the LexisNexis 15th Edition Hardbound is the definitive high-quality choice.
Justice G.P. Singh's Principles of Statutory Interpretation is the definitive, most comprehensive work on the subject in Indian law, widely cited by the Supreme Court and High Courts. The 15th Edition (2024) , updated by Justice Alok Aradhe and published by LexisNexis
, captures the modern judicial shift from strict literalism to a more purposive approach. Bharat Law House Core Principles from G.P. Singh Ascertaining Legislative Intent
: The primary aim of interpretation is to find the "intention of the legislature," as expressed through the language of the statute. Statute Read as a Whole
: A provision must never be read in isolation; it must be understood within the context of the entire statute, its previous legal state, and the "mischief" it intended to remedy. Effective and Workable Construction
: Courts lean toward interpretations that make the law operative rather than futile ( ut res magis valeat quam pereat Plain Meaning Rule
: If words are clear and unambiguous after examining them in context, the court must give effect to that meaning regardless of the consequences.
Lexis Nexis’s Principles of Statutory Interpretation by Justice G P Singh
Anyone drafting subordinate legislation (rules, regulations, bylaws) must understand how courts will later interpret their words. GP Singh is the prophylactic against drafting errors.
The mischief rule (Heydon’s Case (1584)) asks: (1) What was the common law before the Act? (2) What mischief did the common law not address? (3) What remedy did Parliament propose? (4) Why that remedy? The court must suppress the mischief and advance the remedy.
Singh elevates the mischief rule into what modern jurisprudence calls purposive construction – especially for social welfare, consumer protection, and human rights statutes. He draws on Pepper v. Hart [1993] AC 593 (UK) and Bengal Immunity Co. v. State of Bihar (1955) (SC: “We must look at the general scope and purview of the statute and the remedy the legislature intends to apply”).
Key insight from Singh: The mischief rule is not archaic; it is the original purposivism. However, he warns against “judicial legislation” – the purpose must emerge from the statute itself, not from judges’ policy preferences.
In the realm of legal scholarship, few works achieve the status of being indispensable. For students, practitioners, and judges in India and beyond, "Principles of Statutory Interpretation" by the late Justice G.P. Singh is not merely a book—it is a legacy. First published in 1966, this treatise has become the gold standard for understanding how courts breathe life into the dry text of legislation.
When legal professionals search for a "high-quality" exposition of statutory interpretation, they are implicitly seeking the depth, precision, and authority that only a work like GP Singh’s provides. This article delves into why this text remains the ultimate authority, the core principles it champions, and how to identify a high-quality edition for your legal arsenal.
Indian Supreme Court judgments routinely quote Singh as the final authority on interpretation. In Reserve Bank of India v. Peerless General Finance (1987), Justice O. Chinnappa Reddy famously echoed Singh’s philosophy:
“Interpretation is the art of finding the intention of Parliament. It is not a mechanical exercise in reading words, but a holistic task of understanding the statute as an instrument of social policy.”
Similarly, in State of Haryana v. Rani Devi (1996), the Court leaned heavily on Singh’s chapter on “Retrospective Operation” to hold that procedural statutes generally operate prospectively unless express.
Law firms, judicial academies, and civil services aspirants (judicial branch) treat Singh as the definitive source. A quick Westlaw search shows over 1,200 Supreme Court judgments directly citing G.P. Singh, Principles of Statutory Interpretation.
