Legalporno - Vittoria Devine Ah049 -21.01.2025-... May 2026

| Citation | Key Points | Access | |---|---|---| | Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press. | Provides a deep dive into how platforms develop and enforce content policies, including adult content. | Library holdings; e‑book excerpts available on Google Books. | | Matsakis, L. (2023). “Age‑Verification Technology for Adult Websites: Effectiveness, Privacy, and Legal Risks.” IEEE Security & Privacy, 21(2), 34‑42. | Technical evaluation of age‑gate solutions and the legal implications under GDPR and CCPA. | IEEE Xplore (institutional access). | | Baker, S. (2021). “The ‘Adult‑Content’ Clause in Influencer Contracts: Emerging Trends in Entertainment Law.” Entertainment Law Review, 32(4), 455‑472. | Examines contractual language used by talent agencies and platforms when representing adult‑content creators. | Open‑access via Entertainment Law Review website. |

| Citation | Summary | Access | |---|---|---| | Holt, C., & Kavanagh, C. (2020). “Sex Work, Digital Platforms, and Labor Rights.” Industrial Relations Journal, 51(4), 388‑405. | Discusses how adult‑content creators negotiate labor rights, payment models, and platform policies. | DOI link (open‑access). | | Sanchez, M. (2019). “Pornography, Consent, and the Law: A Critical Review.” Journal of Gender Studies, 28(3), 329‑347. | Provides a feminist legal critique of consent‑based regulations and the role of “revenge porn” statutes. | Available via Taylor & Francis Online (institutional). | | Ferguson, N. (2022). “Economic Contributions of the Adult Entertainment Industry: A Macro‑Analysis.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(2), 115‑138. | Quantifies the industry’s GDP contribution, tax revenues, and employment figures for selected OECD economies. | Open‑access PDF on JEP site. | LegalPorno - Vittoria Devine AH049 -21.01.2025-...

When it comes to performers like Vittoria Devine, they usually work under contracts or agreements with production companies or platforms. These agreements often include clauses related to: | Citation | Key Points | Access |

| Case | Year | Holding (brief) | Relevance | |---|---|---|---| | Miller v. California | 1973 | Established the three‑prong “community‑standards” test for obscenity. | Foundation of modern U.S. obscenity law. | | Ashcroft v. ACLU | 2002 | Upheld the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) as unconstitutional (overbreadth). | Highlights tension between child‑protection and free speech. | | United States v. Williams | 2008 | Upheld a federal statute criminalizing “pandering” obscene material. | Shows how distribution, not just content, can be regulated. | | Doe v. MySpace, Inc. | 2008 | Dismissed claims that MySpace could be liable for user‑generated adult content. | Important for platform intermediary immunity. | | United States v. Williams | 2018 (SCOTUS) | Reaffirmed that the “obscene” definition requires serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. | Recent clarification of the “serious value” prong. | | Citation | Summary | Access | |---|---|---| | Holt, C